Re: Initial Review: JSON contrib modul was: Re: Another swing at JSON - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Florian Pflug
Subject Re: Initial Review: JSON contrib modul was: Re: Another swing at JSON
Date
Msg-id FD459E4C-CFD4-4AB3-A5B4-65B504C142C8@phlo.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Initial Review: JSON contrib modul was: Re: Another swing at JSON  (Joey Adams <joeyadams3.14159@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Jul25, 2011, at 07:35 , Joey Adams wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 1:05 AM, Joey Adams <joeyadams3.14159@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Should we mimic IEEE floats and preserve -0 versus +0 while treating
>> them as equal?  Or should we treat JSON floats like numeric and
>> convert -0 to 0 on input?  Or should we do something else?  I think
>> converting -0 to 0 would be a bad idea, as it would violate the
>> intuitive assumption that JSON can be used to marshal double-precision
>> floats.
>
> On the other hand, JavaScript's own .toString and JSON.stringify turn
> -0 into 0, so JSON can't marshal -0 around, anyway (in practice).  Now
> I think turning -0 into 0 would be fine for canonicalizing numbers in
> json_in.

+1.

best regards,
Florian Pflug



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kohei KaiGai
Date:
Subject: Re: Environment checks prior to regression tests?
Next
From: Florian Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: Initial Review: JSON contrib modul was: Re: Another swing at JSON