Hell Hackers, long time no email! I got a bug report for the semver extension: https://github.com/theory/pg-semver/issues/58 It claims that a test unexpected passes. That is, Test #31 is expected to fail, because it intentionally tests a versionin which its parts overflow the int32[3] they’re stored in, with the expectation that one day we can refactor thetype to handle larger version parts. I can’t imagine there would be any circumstance under which int32 would somehow be larger than a signed 32-bit integer, butperhaps there is? Scroll to the bottom of these pages to see the unexpected passes on i386 and armhf: https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/i386/p/postgresql-semver/15208658/log.gz https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/armhf/p/postgresql-semver/15208657/log.gz Here’s the Postgres build output for those two platforms, as well, though nothing jumps out at me: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=postgresql-13&arch=i386&ver=13.4-3&stamp=1630408269&raw=0 https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=postgresql-13&arch=armhf&ver=13.4-3&stamp=1630412028&raw=0 Thanks, David
pgsql-hackers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных