> On 2 Nov 2019, at 03:21, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2019-11-01 23:19:33 +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> + * StringInfo provides an extensible string data type. It can be used to
>>
>> It might be useful to point out the upper bound on the extensibility in the
>> rewrite of this sentence, and that it’s not guaranteed to be consistent between
>> frontend and backend.
>
> Hm. Something like 'Currently the maximum length of a StringInfo is
> 1GB.’?
Something along those lines (or the define/mechanism with which the upper
boundary controlled, simply stating the limit seems more straightforward.)
> I don't really think it's worth pointing out that they may not be
> consistent, when they currently are…
Good point.
> And I suspect we should just fix the length limit to be higher for both,
> perhaps somehow allowing to limit the length for the backend cases where
> we want to error out if a string gets too long (possibly adding a
> separate initialization API that allows to specify the memory allocation
> flags or such).
Sounds reasonable, maybe even where one can set errhint/errdetail on the “out
of memory” error to get better reporting on failures.
cheers ./daniel
