Re: feature request - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Omar Bettin
Subject Re: feature request
Date
Msg-id FAA31728964B4D2F8603021C57ED0A62@fly01
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: feature request  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: feature request
List pgsql-hackers
...could be
STORE WHERE [condition] FROM [table] INTO [database]

regards
Omar Bettin

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: "Omar Bettin" <o.bettin@informaticaindustriale.it>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 11:11 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] feature request


> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Omar Bettin
> <o.bettin@informaticaindustriale.it> wrote:
>> hello to everyone,
>> is a bit late for an italian, but after an long day debugging I had an 
>> idea.
>> Why not introduce a special SQL command like
>> STORE WHERE [condition] FROM [table]
>> removing all data that meet the condition and storing them into another
>> database?
>> Then, if a query that needs the stored data is executed after such 
>> command
>> the database joins the stored data into the result query.
>> This can keep the production database lightweight and fast.
>> Regards
>
> DELETE ... RETURNING is useful for this kind of thing, sometimes.  And
> you could use it inside a function to go and do something with each
> row returned, though that might not be very graceful for large numbers
> of rows.  The proposed syntax wouldn't actually work because it
> doesn't specify where to put the data.
>
> ...Robert
>
> -- 
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gokulakannan Somasundaram
Date:
Subject: Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: feature request