Re: feature request - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: feature request
Date
Msg-id 603c8f071002251411r2de0426chf8b89f0db4b09b14@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to feature request  ("Omar Bettin" <o.bettin@informaticaindustriale.it>)
Responses Re: feature request
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Omar Bettin
<o.bettin@informaticaindustriale.it> wrote:
> hello to everyone,
> is a bit late for an italian, but after an long day debugging I had an idea.
> Why not introduce a special SQL command like
> STORE WHERE [condition] FROM [table]
> removing all data that meet the condition and storing them into another
> database?
> Then, if a query that needs the stored data is executed after such command
> the database joins the stored data into the result query.
> This can keep the production database lightweight and fast.
> Regards

DELETE ... RETURNING is useful for this kind of thing, sometimes.  And
you could use it inside a function to go and do something with each
row returned, though that might not be very graceful for large numbers
of rows.  The proposed syntax wouldn't actually work because it
doesn't specify where to put the data.

...Robert


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Allow vacuumdb to only analyze
Next
From: Gokulakannan Somasundaram
Date:
Subject: Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables