Re: revised hstore patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David E. Wheeler
Subject Re: revised hstore patch
Date
Msg-id FA73FB99-D763-4A89-AEFE-30038351CF8C@kineticode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: revised hstore patch  (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Jul 22, 2009, at 11:17 AM, Andrew Gierth wrote:

> To me (A) is looking like the obvious choice (the people smart enough
> to be using hstore-new from CVS already can handle the minor pain of
> updating the on-disk format).
>
> Unless I hear any objections I will proceed accordingly...

Yes, that seems like the smarter path to me, too, as long as the new  
format does not continue the bug, of course.

But should the "bug" be fixed in maintenance branches? I'm thinking,  
since its likelihood is so rare, probably not.

Best,

David


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tsutomu Yamada
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows
Next
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: extension facility (was: revised hstore patch)