Re: psql: add \pset true/false - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Matthijs van der Vleuten
Subject Re: psql: add \pset true/false
Date
Msg-id FA73A3C2-9FE4-4122-8D3D-E86C1734F435@zr40.nl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: psql: add \pset true/false  (Brendan Jurd <direvus@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: psql: add \pset true/false  (Vik Fearing <vik@2ndquadrant.fr>)
Re: psql: add \pset true/false  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Re: psql: add \pset true/false  ("Daniel Verite" <daniel@manitou-mail.org>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 12 Nov 2015, at 14:21, Brendan Jurd <direvus@gmail.com> wrote:

On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 at 00:51 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
The really key argument that hasn't been addressed here is why does such
a behavior belong in psql, rather than elsewhere?  Surely legibility
problems aren't unique to psql users.  Moreover, there are exactly
parallel facilities for other datatypes on the server side: think
DateStyle or bytea_output.  So if you were trying to follow precedent
rather than invent a kluge, you'd have submitted a patch to create a GUC
that changes the output of boolout().

I find Tom's analogy to datestyle and bytea_output convincing.

+1 for a GUC that changes the behaviour of boolout.

-1 for changing boolout(). It will break anything that receives boolean values from the server. How a client is going to display values (of any type) is logic that should belong in the client, not in the protocol.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: LLVM miscompiles numeric.c access to short numeric var headers
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: LLVM miscompiles numeric.c access to short numeric var headers