Shenanigans!
That problem occurs regardless of whether or not you use surrogate keys.
You have exceeded the scope of the example.
--
Brandon Aiken
CS/IT Systems Engineer
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Scott Ribe
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 4:01 PM
To: Joshua D. Drake; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] IS it a good practice to use SERIAL as Primary
Key?
> You would update the address, the address id wouldn't change. If you
> want to keep track of old addresses you would keep an archive table
> associated with the user.id.
But what about historical data that referenced the address? If you move
today, I still want to know where I shipped last week's orders.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_ribe@killerbytes.com
http://www.killerbytes.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
