I have a couple of questions about OIDs....
First, why would one choose to not use an OID as the
primary-key/foreign-key-reference for a table? It is unique (good thing) and
lacks business meaning (another good thing), so it seems to me to be just
the thing, a nice surrogate key. Is it just because of the name? I would
agree that as a foreign key reference a la:
create table employee_child (
parent oid references employee(oid),
name varchar(4) ....
looks kind of bad, but that is the worst drawback my
non-postgresql-experienced brain can conjure up.
Second, what is the scale of an OID? Does it map to an INT4 or an INT8? I
will be accessing the data via JDBC so I need to know what java type to use.
Third, is there any bottleneck or other problem associated with using OIDs
versus turning them off and using a self-defined SERIAL field? Or is the
opposite true?
Thanks!
John
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
john guthrie
american institutes for research
jguthrie@air.org
202-298-2716
