Hi!
> 4 сент. 2019 г., в 2:13, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> написал(а):
>
> On 2019-Mar-29, Andrey Borodin wrote:
>
>> Here's updated patch with AccessShareLock.
>> I've tried to stress this with combination of random inserts, vaccuums and checks. This process neither failed, nor
deadlocked.
>> The patch intentionally contains one superflous line to make gist logically broken. This triggers regression test of
amcheck.
>
> How close are we to this being a committable patch? CF bot complains
> that it doesn't apply anymore (please rebase), but from past discussion
> it seems pretty close to ready.
Here's rebased version. Changes in v9:
* adjust to usage of table_open
* update new extension version
* check for main fork presence in GiST check too
Thanks!
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
