Re: Autovacuum Logging - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Larry Rosenman
Subject Re: Autovacuum Logging
Date
Msg-id F6616E0E81AC0841B1F9DD252F7C4B55041A45@ausmaildd.aus.pervasive.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Autovacuum Logging  (Will Reese <wreese@rackspace.com>)
List pgsql-general
Robert Treat wrote:
> On Thursday 27 April 2006 11:59, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Well, one problem now is that everytime pg_autovacuum opens a
>> database, a message is placed in the logs:
>>
>>     LOG:  autovacuum: processing database "test"
>>     LOG:  autovacuum: processing database "test"
>>     LOG:  autovacuum: processing database "test"
>>     LOG:  autovacuum: processing database "test"
>>
>> This is certainly not desirable.  I changed the message to DEBUG1 for
>> 8.2 with the attached patch.
>
> IMHO this is less optimal, since the default installation will
> provide no way for users to verify that autovacuum is running.
> Currently we can direct them to look in thier log output, this way we
> would have to tell them to crank up logging to DEBUG1 and then look,
> which will of course contain a whole lot of other chatter at that
> level.
>
> The best solution I have seen so far is the idea of a GUC to control
> autovacuums chatter level.  I hope we get that becuase the above will
> be a regression imho.

I've put a basic proposal out to -hackers, and have the time and
inclination
to do it.

Comments requested, please.

LER


--
Larry Rosenman
Database Support Engineer

PERVASIVE SOFTWARE. INC.
12365B RIATA TRACE PKWY
3015
AUSTIN TX  78727-6531

Tel: 512.231.6173
Fax: 512.231.6597
Email: Larry.Rosenman@pervasive.com
Web: www.pervasive.com

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: Autovacuum Logging
Next
From: "Don Walker"
Date:
Subject: Use of ISpell dictionaries with tsearch2 - what is the point?