Re: bug of recovery? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Florian Pflug
Subject Re: bug of recovery?
Date
Msg-id F4BDC274-D382-4BC2-A093-282E29523DD8@phlo.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: bug of recovery?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: bug of recovery?
Re: bug of recovery?
List pgsql-hackers
On Sep26, 2011, at 22:39 , Tom Lane wrote:
> It might be worthwhile to invoke XLogCheckInvalidPages() as soon as
> we (think we) have reached consistency, rather than leaving it to be
> done only when we exit recovery mode.

I believe we also need to prevent the creation of restart points before
we've reached consistency. If we're starting from an online backup,
and a checkpoint occurred between pg_start_backup() and pg_stop_backup(),
we currently create a restart point upon replaying that checkpoint's
xlog record. At that point, however, unresolved page references are
not an error, since a truncation that happened after the checkpoint
(but before pg_stop_backup()) might or might not be reflected in the
online backup.

best regards,
Florian Pflug



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: psql setenv command
Next
From: panam
Date:
Subject: Re: fix for pg_upgrade