On May 11, 2016, at 10:34 AM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not clear enough on your intended usage to know whether these
> operators are a good fit, but they are sitting there waiting to be
> used if they do fit.
Huh. I haven’t had any problems with IS DISTINCT FROM for rows, except for the situation in which a failure is thrown
becausethe types vary, say between TEXT and CITEXT. That can drive the tester crazy, since it says something like:
Results differ beginning at row 3: have: (44,Anna) want: (44,Anna)
But overall I think that’s okay; the tester really does want to make sure the type is correct.
Thanks,
David
