Aehemm, ...
In the meantime I changed the structure of the original table but to be able to reproduce the error I created a new one
andfilled the same data in it.
Guess what, now it works.
Access is fast and EXPLAIN tells me that it uses the index.
Sorry for any inconvenience.
I am so very sure that I did exactly the same as I did with the original table that brought me to this error.
But I'll make some additional tests and if I can reproduce the error I'll ask again with some more exact information.
Sorry again
Ciao
Alexander, somehow confused
>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>Von: scott.marlowe [mailto:scott.marlowe@ihs.com]
>Gesendet: Montag, 27. Oktober 2003 15:41
>An: Staff, Alexander
>Cc: 'pgsql-general@postgresql.org'
>Betreff: Re: [GENERAL] Index Usage Question
>
>
>On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Staff, Alexander wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I created a simple table (name char200, zip char10, city
>char200, street char200, id int) and filled some data, appr.
>250 000 records, in it.
>> I tested accessing some rows (select id from address where
>id = 44444;, select * from address where id between 33333,
>333444) with an unique index on id and without an index.
>EXPLAIN tells me in both cases that it does NOT use the index.
>> I tested this with using the name column (select name from
>address where name like 'Wal%';, select name from address
>where name = 'Walz') and if I created an index on name it uses it.
>> Using id in the where clause of the select is as slow as
>using an unindexed name in the where-clause.
>> I ran ANALYZE, no changes.
>> What's this ?
>> This is not a feature, is it ?
>
>Can we see the output of explain analyze select...(your query here)???
>
