PostgreSQL 9.2 and PGBOUNCER - Mailing list pgsql-general

From ac@hsk.hk
Subject PostgreSQL 9.2 and PGBOUNCER
Date
Msg-id F2E26156-F0FE-40CD-A386-E304A1401889@hsk.hk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unnecessary files that can be deleted/moved in cluster dir?  (Raghavendra <raghavendra.rao@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL 9.2 and PGBOUNCER  (Birta Levente <blevi.linux@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Hi,


My PostgreSQL is 9.2.1 in Ubuntu 12.04, I need to set up a connection pool by using pgbouncer.


I used "apt-get install pgbouncer", after configuring it, I can now connect to pgbouncer and can use all pgbouncer SHOW commands,  however:

Q1) Is  version "1.4.2/bouncer" the right one for PostgreSQL 9.2?
$ psql -U postgres -p 6543 pgbouncer
psql.bin (9.2.1, server 1.4.2/bouncer)
WARNING: psql.bin version 9.2, server version 1.4.
        Some psql features might not work.
Type "help" for help.
No entry for terminal type "xterm-color";
using dumb terminal settings.


Q2) if I try the general psql commands, I got errors
for example:
$ psql -U postgres -p 6543 pgbouncer
pgbouncer=# \l
ERROR:  invalid command 'SELECT d.datname as "Name",
        pg_catalog.pg_get_userbyid(d.datdba) as "Owner",
        pg_catalog.pg_encoding_to_char(d.encoding) as "Encoding",
       pg_catalog.array_to_string(d.datacl, '\n') AS "Access privileges"
FROM pg_catalog.pg_database d
ORDER BY 1;', use SHOW HELP;


Q3) I can connect to pgbouncer by using "psql -U postgres -p 6543 pgbouncer", however if I try to use "-d postgres", I got error:
$ psql -U postgres -p 6543 pgbouncer -d postgres  
psql.bin: warning: extra command-line argument "pgbouncer" ignored
psql.bin: ERROR:  no working server connection
 

Q4) Which port should I use in my application in order to connect to PostgreSQL via pgbouncer, port 6543 or port 5432?
the port value in pgbounce.ini: 
postgres = port=5432 dbname=postgres
listen_port = 6543
the port value in postgresql.conf: 
port=5432 



Please help!
Thanks



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Jackie Zhang
Date:
Subject: Why the default data range for "pre_auth_delay" and "post_auth_delay" is different?
Next
From: Birta Levente
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 9.2 and PGBOUNCER