Re: supporting any/all connection types including unix domain sockets - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Travis Wellman
Subject Re: supporting any/all connection types including unix domain sockets
Date
Msg-id F1336189-479C-4792-821B-084119D42400@traviswellman.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: supporting any/all connection types including unix domain sockets  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
Responses Re: supporting any/all connection types including unix domain sockets
List pgsql-jdbc
Is it the same protocol?

On July 16, 2015 3:31:13 AM PDT, Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> wrote:


On 16 July 2015 at 02:21, Luca Ferrari <fluca1978@infinito.it> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Travis Wellman
<travis@traviswellman.com> wrote:
> Because I need to be able to connect in whatever way was previously
> configured.

Then I'll take a look at libpq details.
However, I believe this is not the right path, I mean there's nothing
insecure in configuring a single user to access via tcp/ip (secure)
sockets and use well tested jdbc code.
My 2cents.

Luca

Yes, the notion would be to hook into the JDBC code with something that communicated with sockets instead

Dave Cramer

dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: supporting any/all connection types including unix domain sockets
Next
From: Luca Ferrari
Date:
Subject: Re: supporting any/all connection types including unix domain sockets