Re: Force disable of SSL renegociation in the server - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: Force disable of SSL renegociation in the server
Date
Msg-id F10B1EDA-5771-4F8B-832B-D2A33E4D9077@yesql.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Force disable of SSL renegociation in the server  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Force disable of SSL renegociation in the server
List pgsql-hackers
> On 20 May 2021, at 13:00, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:

> - SSL_OP_NO_RENEGOTIATION controls that.  It is present in OpenSSL >=
> 1.1.1 and has been backported in 1.1.0h (it is not present in older
> versions of 1.1.0).

For OpenSSL 1.1.0 versions < 1.1.0h it will be silently accepted without
actually doing anything, so we might want to combine it with the below.

> - In 1.0.2 and older versions, OpenSSL has an undocumented flag called
> SSL3_FLAGS_NO_RENEGOTIATE_CIPHERS, able to do the same as far as I
> understand.

Well, it's documented in the changelog that it's undocumented (sigh..) along
with a note stating that it works like SSL_OP_NO_RENEGOTIATION.  Skimming the
code it seems to ring true.  For older OpenSSL versions there's also
SSL_OP_ALLOW_UNSAFE_LEGACY_RENEGOTIATION which controls renegotiation for an
older OpenSSL reneg bug.  That applies to 0.9.8 versions which we don't
support, but a malicious user can craft whatever they feel like so maybe we
should ensure it's off as well?

> Could there be a point in backpatching that, in light of what we have done in
> 48d23c72 in the past, though?

I think there is merit to that idea, especially given the precedent.

> Thoughts?

+    /* disallow SSL renegociation, option available since 1.1.0h */
s/renegociation/renegotiation/

+1 on disabling renegotiation, but I think it's worth considering using
SSL3_FLAGS_NO_RENEGOTIATE_CIPHERS as well.  One could also argue that extending
the comment with a note that it only applies to TLSv1.2 and lower could be
helpful to readers who aren't familiar with TLS protocol versions.  TLSv1.3 did
away with renegotiation.

--
Daniel Gustafsson        https://vmware.com/




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Diagnostic comment in LogicalIncreaseXminForSlot
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Skip partition tuple routing with constant partition key