Re: Change to EnterpriseDB website - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Hans-Juergen Schoenig
Subject Re: Change to EnterpriseDB website
Date
Msg-id F05D9440-F37C-4D46-93CD-78F1E6406F03@cybertec.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Change to EnterpriseDB website  ("Derek Rodner" <derek.rodner@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Change to EnterpriseDB website  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-advocacy
good morning,

the texts on your website must be wonderful.
but it is good enough to justify spamming this mailing list?

best regards,

hans



On Jul 17, 2007, at 10:19 PM, Derek Rodner wrote:

Folks,

I wanted to let you know that we have changed the text on our website
from:  

EnterpriseDB substantially enhanced PostgreSQL, the world's most
advanced open source database, to create the EnterpriseDB Database
Server. The product retains the legendary stability and reliability of
PostgreSQL while performing up to 200% faster.

To:  
EnterpriseDB substantially enhanced PostgreSQL, the world's most
advanced open source database, to create the EnterpriseDB Database
Server. The product retains the legendary stability and reliability of
PostgreSQL while adding Oracle compatibility and DynaTune(tm), an
automated tuning function that reduces the need to continually manage
performance.

We will be making the same change to our data sheet as well.


Derek M. Rodner
Director, Product Strategy
EnterpriseDB Corporation
732.331.1333 office
484.252.1943 cell
www.enterprisedb.com

-----Original Message-----
[mailto:pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Hammond
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 6:38 PM
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Problem with recent PostgreSQL
relatedpressrelease

On Jul 14, 3:04 pm, da...@fetter.org (David Fetter) wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 02:06:14PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Dave Page wrote:

PostgreSQL Core is the distribution developed and distributed by
the
PostgreSQL.Org community. We are one of the many contributors to
this
excellent database software. It is 100% enterprise ready and
commercially supported.

Which means what exactly? Precisely nothing as far as whether CMD
are
THE PostgreSQL Company or A PostgreSQL Company.

Precisely nothing to you, which I accept. It a differentiating
factor
for us.

It also happens to be objectively false and misleading, as many people
have told you many times.  To take one example, Varlena LLC has been
doing exclusively PostgreSQL for quite some time.  There are other
companies not based in North America that do the same.  Please stop
this, keeping in mind that business in Matthew 7:1-5.

Sincerely,
David
who also does PostgreSQL exclusively, and doesn't work at CMD.

To the point, if you are willing to accept that there are companies
other than CMD which could be reasonably described as "A PostgreSQL
Company" then CMD calling themselves "The PostgreSQL Company" doesn't
seem all that reasonable.

CMD has a lot to offer as a company. I can't understand why they'd
waste the attention of a potential client with what is clearly
marketing speak.

Andrew


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

               http://archives.postgresql.org

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
       match



--
Cybertec Geschwinde & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26, 2700 Wiener Neustadt
Tel: +43/1/205 10 35 / 340
www.postgresql.at, www.cybertec.at


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL relatedpressrelease
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Change to EnterpriseDB website