Re: Change to EnterpriseDB website - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy
From | Hans-Juergen Schoenig |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Change to EnterpriseDB website |
Date | |
Msg-id | F05D9440-F37C-4D46-93CD-78F1E6406F03@cybertec.at Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Change to EnterpriseDB website ("Derek Rodner" <derek.rodner@enterprisedb.com>) |
Responses |
Re: Change to EnterpriseDB website
|
List | pgsql-advocacy |
good morning,
the texts on your website must be wonderful.
but it is good enough to justify spamming this mailing list?
best regards,
hans
On Jul 17, 2007, at 10:19 PM, Derek Rodner wrote:
Folks,I wanted to let you know that we have changed the text on our websitefrom:EnterpriseDB substantially enhanced PostgreSQL, the world's mostadvanced open source database, to create the EnterpriseDB DatabaseServer. The product retains the legendary stability and reliability ofPostgreSQL while performing up to 200% faster.To:EnterpriseDB substantially enhanced PostgreSQL, the world's mostadvanced open source database, to create the EnterpriseDB DatabaseServer. The product retains the legendary stability and reliability ofPostgreSQL while adding Oracle compatibility and DynaTune(tm), anautomated tuning function that reduces the need to continually manageperformance.We will be making the same change to our data sheet as well.Derek M. RodnerDirector, Product StrategyEnterpriseDB Corporation732.331.1333 office484.252.1943 cellwww.enterprisedb.com-----Original Message-----[mailto:pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Andrew HammondSent: Monday, July 16, 2007 6:38 PMSubject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Problem with recent PostgreSQLrelatedpressreleaseOn Jul 14, 3:04 pm, da...@fetter.org (David Fetter) wrote:On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 02:06:14PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:Dave Page wrote:Joshua D. Drake wrote:Dave Page wrote:PostgreSQL Core is the distribution developed and distributed bythePostgreSQL.Org community. We are one of the many contributors tothisexcellent database software. It is 100% enterprise ready andcommercially supported.Which means what exactly? Precisely nothing as far as whether CMDareTHE PostgreSQL Company or A PostgreSQL Company.Precisely nothing to you, which I accept. It a differentiatingfactorfor us.It also happens to be objectively false and misleading, as many peoplehave told you many times. To take one example, Varlena LLC has beendoing exclusively PostgreSQL for quite some time. There are othercompanies not based in North America that do the same. Please stopthis, keeping in mind that business in Matthew 7:1-5.Sincerely,Davidwho also does PostgreSQL exclusively, and doesn't work at CMD.To the point, if you are willing to accept that there are companiesother than CMD which could be reasonably described as "A PostgreSQLCompany" then CMD calling themselves "The PostgreSQL Company" doesn'tseem all that reasonable.CMD has a lot to offer as a company. I can't understand why they'dwaste the attention of a potential client with what is clearlymarketing speak.Andrew---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire tochoose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do notmatch
--
Cybertec Geschwinde & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26, 2700 Wiener Neustadt
Tel: +43/1/205 10 35 / 340
www.postgresql.at, www.cybertec.at
pgsql-advocacy by date: