Change to EnterpriseDB website - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy
From | Derek Rodner |
---|---|
Subject | Change to EnterpriseDB website |
Date | |
Msg-id | 51494DB187D98F4C88DBEBF1F5F6D42301F47269@edb06.mail01.enterprisedb.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL relatedpressrelease (Andrew Hammond <andrew.george.hammond@gmail.com>) |
Responses |
Re: Change to EnterpriseDB website
Re: Change to EnterpriseDB website Re: Change to EnterpriseDB website |
List | pgsql-advocacy |
Folks, I wanted to let you know that we have changed the text on our website from: EnterpriseDB substantially enhanced PostgreSQL, the world's most advanced open source database, to create the EnterpriseDB Database Server. The product retains the legendary stability and reliability of PostgreSQL while performing up to 200% faster. To: EnterpriseDB substantially enhanced PostgreSQL, the world's most advanced open source database, to create the EnterpriseDB Database Server. The product retains the legendary stability and reliability of PostgreSQL while adding Oracle compatibility and DynaTune(tm), an automated tuning function that reduces the need to continually manage performance. We will be making the same change to our data sheet as well. Derek M. Rodner Director, Product Strategy EnterpriseDB Corporation 732.331.1333 office 484.252.1943 cell www.enterprisedb.com -----Original Message----- From: pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Hammond Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 6:38 PM To: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Problem with recent PostgreSQL relatedpressrelease On Jul 14, 3:04 pm, da...@fetter.org (David Fetter) wrote: > On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 02:06:14PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > Dave Page wrote: > > >Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > >>Dave Page wrote: > > > >>PostgreSQL Core is the distribution developed and distributed by the > > >>PostgreSQL.Org community. We are one of the many contributors to this > > >>excellent database software. It is 100% enterprise ready and > > >>commercially supported. > > > >Which means what exactly? Precisely nothing as far as whether CMD are > > >THE PostgreSQL Company or A PostgreSQL Company. > > > Precisely nothing to you, which I accept. It a differentiating factor > > for us. > > It also happens to be objectively false and misleading, as many people > have told you many times. To take one example, Varlena LLC has been > doing exclusively PostgreSQL for quite some time. There are other > companies not based in North America that do the same. Please stop > this, keeping in mind that business in Matthew 7:1-5. > > Sincerely, > David > who also does PostgreSQL exclusively, and doesn't work at CMD. To the point, if you are willing to accept that there are companies other than CMD which could be reasonably described as "A PostgreSQL Company" then CMD calling themselves "The PostgreSQL Company" doesn't seem all that reasonable. CMD has a lot to offer as a company. I can't understand why they'd waste the attention of a potential client with what is clearly marketing speak. Andrew ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
pgsql-advocacy by date: