Re: Change to EnterpriseDB website - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy
From | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Change to EnterpriseDB website |
Date | |
Msg-id | 200707172130.l6HLUH714302@momjian.us Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Change to EnterpriseDB website ("Derek Rodner" <derek.rodner@enterprisedb.com>) |
Responses |
Re: Change to EnterpriseDB website
|
List | pgsql-advocacy |
That was fast, in fact, 200% faster than I expected. ;-) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Derek Rodner wrote: > Folks, > > I wanted to let you know that we have changed the text on our website > from: > > EnterpriseDB substantially enhanced PostgreSQL, the world's most > advanced open source database, to create the EnterpriseDB Database > Server. The product retains the legendary stability and reliability of > PostgreSQL while performing up to 200% faster. > > To: > EnterpriseDB substantially enhanced PostgreSQL, the world's most > advanced open source database, to create the EnterpriseDB Database > Server. The product retains the legendary stability and reliability of > PostgreSQL while adding Oracle compatibility and DynaTune(tm), an > automated tuning function that reduces the need to continually manage > performance. > > We will be making the same change to our data sheet as well. > > > Derek M. Rodner > Director, Product Strategy > EnterpriseDB Corporation > 732.331.1333 office > 484.252.1943 cell > www.enterprisedb.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Hammond > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 6:38 PM > To: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Problem with recent PostgreSQL > relatedpressrelease > > On Jul 14, 3:04 pm, da...@fetter.org (David Fetter) wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 02:06:14PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > > Dave Page wrote: > > > >Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > > >>Dave Page wrote: > > > > > >>PostgreSQL Core is the distribution developed and distributed by > the > > > >>PostgreSQL.Org community. We are one of the many contributors to > this > > > >>excellent database software. It is 100% enterprise ready and > > > >>commercially supported. > > > > > >Which means what exactly? Precisely nothing as far as whether CMD > are > > > >THE PostgreSQL Company or A PostgreSQL Company. > > > > > Precisely nothing to you, which I accept. It a differentiating > factor > > > for us. > > > > It also happens to be objectively false and misleading, as many people > > have told you many times. To take one example, Varlena LLC has been > > doing exclusively PostgreSQL for quite some time. There are other > > companies not based in North America that do the same. Please stop > > this, keeping in mind that business in Matthew 7:1-5. > > > > Sincerely, > > David > > who also does PostgreSQL exclusively, and doesn't work at CMD. > > To the point, if you are willing to accept that there are companies > other than CMD which could be reasonably described as "A PostgreSQL > Company" then CMD calling themselves "The PostgreSQL Company" doesn't > seem all that reasonable. > > CMD has a lot to offer as a company. I can't understand why they'd > waste the attention of a potential client with what is clearly > marketing speak. > > Andrew > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to > choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not > match -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
pgsql-advocacy by date: