Re: Change to EnterpriseDB website - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy
From | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Change to EnterpriseDB website |
Date | |
Msg-id | 469D654E.2000308@commandprompt.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Change to EnterpriseDB website (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
List | pgsql-advocacy |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > That was fast, in fact, 200% faster than I expected. ;-) > >> To: >> EnterpriseDB substantially enhanced PostgreSQL, the world's most >> advanced open source database, to create the EnterpriseDB Database >> Server. The product retains the legendary stability and reliability of >> PostgreSQL while adding Oracle compatibility and DynaTune(tm), an >> automated tuning function that reduces the need to continually manage >> performance. >> >> We will be making the same change to our data sheet as well. Looks great! Joshua D. Drake >> >> >> Derek M. Rodner >> Director, Product Strategy >> EnterpriseDB Corporation >> 732.331.1333 office >> 484.252.1943 cell >> www.enterprisedb.com >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org >> [mailto:pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Hammond >> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 6:38 PM >> To: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org >> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Problem with recent PostgreSQL >> relatedpressrelease >> >> On Jul 14, 3:04 pm, da...@fetter.org (David Fetter) wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 02:06:14PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >>>> Dave Page wrote: >>>>> Joshua D. Drake wrote: >>>>>> Dave Page wrote: >>>>>> PostgreSQL Core is the distribution developed and distributed by >> the >>>>>> PostgreSQL.Org community. We are one of the many contributors to >> this >>>>>> excellent database software. It is 100% enterprise ready and >>>>>> commercially supported. >>>>> Which means what exactly? Precisely nothing as far as whether CMD >> are >>>>> THE PostgreSQL Company or A PostgreSQL Company. >>>> Precisely nothing to you, which I accept. It a differentiating >> factor >>>> for us. >>> It also happens to be objectively false and misleading, as many people >>> have told you many times. To take one example, Varlena LLC has been >>> doing exclusively PostgreSQL for quite some time. There are other >>> companies not based in North America that do the same. Please stop >>> this, keeping in mind that business in Matthew 7:1-5. >>> >>> Sincerely, >>> David >>> who also does PostgreSQL exclusively, and doesn't work at CMD. >> To the point, if you are willing to accept that there are companies >> other than CMD which could be reasonably described as "A PostgreSQL >> Company" then CMD calling themselves "The PostgreSQL Company" doesn't >> seem all that reasonable. >> >> CMD has a lot to offer as a company. I can't understand why they'd >> waste the attention of a potential client with what is clearly >> marketing speak. >> >> Andrew >> >> >> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? >> >> http://archives.postgresql.org >> >> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to >> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not >> match > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
pgsql-advocacy by date: