RE: ODBC backward versions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hiroshi Inoue
Subject RE: ODBC backward versions
Date
Msg-id EKEJJICOHDIEMGPNIFIJIEBLDJAA.Inoue@tpf.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to ODBC backward versions  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: ODBC backward versions  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: ODBC backward versions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian
> Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2001 11:01 AM
> To: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: [HACKERS] ODBC backward versions
> 
> 
> I checked the logs, and we released the new 6.4 backend protocol on
> 1998-10-30.  That was 2.5 years ago.
> 
> We normally allow older clients to communicate with newer servers, but
> often we don't support newer clients talking to older servers, sometimes
> even servers one release in the past.  The reason is that the backend
> communication code gets confusing.  For example, I know there were some
> libpq releases that could not talk to servers from the previous release.

Libpq 2.x couldn't talk to pre-6.4 servers. Fortunately ODBC has never
used libpq and could talk to wide range of versions. Should ODBC
throw away the luck ?

> We did allow newer servers to talk to older clients because it is harder
> to upgrade many clients than a single server.
> 
> Seems the <=6.3 compatibility code in our current ODBC is just adding
> confusion for coders and users and should be removed.  Tom Lane agreed.
> 

Where's real coders for psqlodbc driver in the first place ?
Byron has been unavailable for a long time and I've seen 
few improvements for a year or so. Does removing pre-6.4
code improve the status ?  The problem is that there has
been no maintainer of odbc driver.

Regards,
Hiroshi Inoue


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Hiroshi Inoue"
Date:
Subject: RE: [ODBC] RE: [PATCHES] Fix for ODBC close
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [ODBC] RE: [PATCHES] Fix for ODBC close