> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane
>
> >> I have on a web application
> >> update threads set views = views + 1 where forum_id = 1 and
> thread_id = 1
>
> It should work to do
>
> begin;
> select * from threads where forum_id = 1 and thread_id = 1 FOR UPDATE;
> update threads set views = views + 1 where forum_id = 1 and thread_id = 1;
> end;
>
> Note the FOR UPDATE to lock the row and the transaction wrapping to
> define the scope of the lock.
ISTM this is not the case that 'FOR UPDATE' is required.
> Without this I'd expect you to lose
> some counter increments as a result of two processes doing the UPDATE
> at about the same time (both will read the old value of "views" and
> increment it by one).
>
If this is true, it's really a serious bug and must be fixed.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
