RE: File versioning (was: Big 7.1 open items) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hiroshi Inoue
Subject RE: File versioning (was: Big 7.1 open items)
Date
Msg-id EKEJJICOHDIEMGPNIFIJEEFFCCAA.Inoue@seiren.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to File versioning (was: Big 7.1 open items)  (Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA@wien.spardat.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB
> 
> > Besides which, OID alone doesn't give us a possibility of file
> > versioning, and as I commented to Vadim I think we will want that,
> > WAL or no WAL.  So it seems to me the two viable choices are
> > unique-id or OID+version-number.  Either way, the file-naming behavior
> > should be the same across all platforms.
> 
> I do not think the only problem of a failing rename of "temp" to "new" 
> on startup rollforward is issue enough to justify the additional 
> complexity
> a version implys.

Hmm,I've always mentioned about usual rollback and never mentioned
about rollforward on this topic AFAIR. Could you tell me what you mean
by * on startup rollforward* ?

Regards.

Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue@tpf.co.jp


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Hiroshi Inoue"
Date:
Subject: RE: Big 7.1 open items
Next
From: "Grigori Soloviov"
Date:
Subject: Any Documentation on PL/pgSQL?