On Apr 11, 2009, at 6:10 PM, lists@mgreg.com wrote:
> What do you mean when you say the "catalogs...are database-
> specific" ? If I'm understanding what you're saying, my whole point
> is that I don't want to be tied to a database to do any kind of
> querying about the PG engine itself. Does that make sense?
Look at it from the other side; You have a DBMS and you want to store
information about what databases and which users are available, who
can and can't connect, etc. It makes sense to store that in a
database, right?
To request that information you need to connect to the database
server. Considering that information is stored in a database, having
to specify that database to connect to makes sense. Whether that's a
named database (with a documented fixed name of course, in this case
'template1' or 'postgres') or an anonymous database doesn't make much
difference. You'll still have to specify several other connection
parameters (host & port at least), so why not also a valid user (quite
desirable from a security point of view) and a database name?
It may not make as much sense from a user point of view, but it makes
a lot of sense from a database point of view.
Alban Hertroys
--
If you can't see the forest for the trees,
cut the trees and you'll see there is no forest.
!DSPAM:737,49e1ca98129741055947028!
