Re: Conflict with recovery on PG version 11.6 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Toomas Kristin
Subject Re: Conflict with recovery on PG version 11.6
Date
Msg-id ED975043-6B45-4E9E-AC32-683BCDFC9BE0@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Conflict with recovery on PG version 11.6  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Conflict with recovery on PG version 11.6
List pgsql-general
Hi,

Thank you all for help.

> FWIW in case you haven't tried yet, if you could find a DETAILS: line
> following to the ERROR: canceling.." message in server log, it would
> narrow the possibility.


I executed a database dump with 4 jobs and here are logs how this ended.

2020-06-19 02:38:28 UTC:[30953]:ERROR:40001:canceling statement due to conflict with recovery
2020-06-19 02:38:28 UTC:[30953]:DETAIL:User query might have needed to see row versions that must be removed.
2020-06-19 02:38:28 UTC:[30953]:LOCATION:ProcessInterrupts, postgres.c:3057
2020-06-19 02:38:28 UTC:[30953]:STATEMENT:
2020-06-19 02:38:28 UTC:[30926]:FATAL:40001:terminating connection due to conflict with recovery
2020-06-19 02:38:28 UTC:[30926]:DETAIL:User query might have needed to see row versions that must be removed.
2020-06-19 02:38:28 UTC:[30926]:HINT:In a moment you should be able to reconnect to the database and repeat your
command.
2020-06-19 02:38:28 UTC:[30926]:LOCATION:ProcessInterrupts, postgres.c:2987
2020-06-19 02:38:28 UTC:[30952]:ERROR:40001:canceling statement due to conflict with recovery
2020-06-19 02:38:28 UTC:[30952]:DETAIL:User query might have needed to see row versions that must be removed.
2020-06-19 02:38:28 UTC:[30952]:LOCATION:ProcessInterrupts, postgres.c:3057
2020-06-19 02:38:28 UTC:[30952]:STATEMENT:
2020-06-19 02:38:28 UTC:[30953]:LOG:08006:could not receive data from client:Connection reset by peer
2020-06-19 02:38:28 UTC:[30953]:LOCATION:pq_recvbuf, pqcomm.c:978

Does it give any hints for anyone? Or how to find right version of source code what to analyse?

BR,
Toomas




pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Srinivasa T N
Date:
Subject: Re: HASH partitioning not working properly
Next
From: Amul Sul
Date:
Subject: Re: HASH partitioning not working properly