Hmmm, you're right.
Is there any way to do a
explain select * from id_val_tbl where false
while explain doesn't tell SEQ_SCAN?
I have to admit that I didn't performance tested this. I just saw explain
writing SEQ_SCAN.
|-----Original Message-----
|From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
|Sent: Mittwoch, 20. April 2005 23:06
|To: Tambet Matiisen
|Cc: KÖPFERL Robert; pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
|Subject: Re: [SQL] Function to either return one or all records
|
|
|"Tambet Matiisen" <t.matiisen@aprote.ee> writes:
|> Standard technique is to rewrite OR queries to UNION
|queries. I believe PostgreSQL optimizer does not do that
|automatically. So you could try instead:
|
|> select * from id_bal_tbl where $1 is null
|> union all
|> select * from id_bal_tbl where id = $1;
|
|... but that won't do anything to solve the performance problem.
|Doesn't help for the second select to use an index, if the first
|one grovels over the whole table anyway ...
|
| regards, tom lane
|
