Re: asynchronous commit&synchronous replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrey M. Borodin
Subject Re: asynchronous commit&synchronous replication
Date
Msg-id ECD6BF67-E79F-495C-A981-3765A8EAEAF4@yandex-team.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to asynchronous commit&synchronous replication  (Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@garret.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers

> On 10 Aug 2024, at 17:25, Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@garret.ru> wrote:
>
> So should we take in account sync replication in LR apply worker or not?

There was some relevant discussion of this topic on PGCon2020 Unconference [0].
My recollection is that it would be nice to have LR slot setting akin to synchronous_standby_names which describes what
kindof durability guarantees should be met by streamed data. 


Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

[0]
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PgCon_2020_Developer_Unconference/Edge_cases_of_synchronous_replication_in_HA_solutions


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kirill Reshke
Date:
Subject: Re: Constant Splitting/Refactoring
Next
From: Sami Imseih
Date:
Subject: Re: Restart pg_usleep when interrupted