Re: PG shutdown itself? - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Lee Wu
Subject Re: PG shutdown itself?
Date
Msg-id ECAB83AA52BCC043A0E24BBC000010241115AA@mxhq-exch.corp.mxlogic.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to PG shutdown itself?  ("Lee Wu" <Lwu@mxlogic.com>)
List pgsql-admin
Thanks,

I am positive no kill -9 issued.
-bash-2.05b$ ulimit -all
core file size        (blocks, -c) 0
data seg size         (kbytes, -d) unlimited
file size             (blocks, -f) unlimited
max locked memory     (kbytes, -l) 4
max memory size       (kbytes, -m) unlimited
open files                    (-n) 1024
pipe size          (512 bytes, -p) 8
stack size            (kbytes, -s) 10240
cpu time             (seconds, -t) unlimited
max user processes            (-u) 7168
virtual memory        (kbytes, -v) unlimited
-bash-2.05b$ id
uid=1000(postgres) gid=1000(postgres) groups=1000(postgres)


-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Marlowe [mailto:smarlowe@g2switchworks.com]
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 10:51 AM
To: Lee Wu
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] PG shutdown itself?

On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 11:38, Lee Wu wrote:
> Greetings,
>
>
>
> To best of my knowledge, nobody issued pg_ctl stop -m fast while
>
> we experienced PG was trying to shutdown unsuccessfully:
>
>
>
> *** Everything seems normal before this point ***
>
> Mar  3 21:07:55 myhost postgres[630]: [24] LOG:  recycled transaction
> log file 00001ABC0000006D
>
> Mar  3 21:08:57 myhost postgres[5158]: [1] LOG:  fast shutdown request
>
> Mar  3 21:08:57 myhost postgres[5158]: [2] LOG:  aborting any active
> transactions
>
> Mar  3 21:08:57 myhost postgres[14292]: [1] FATAL:  This connection
> has been terminated by the administrator.
>
> *** A lot of "This connection has been terminated by the
> administrator." taken out here ***
>
> Mar  3 21:08:57 myhost postgres[15912]: [3] FATAL:  The database
> system is shutting down
>
> *** A lot the same message as last line till  ***
>
> Mar  3 22:10:39 myhost postgres[1840]: [3] FATAL:  The database system
> is shutting down
>
>
>
> Then I used "-m immediate":
>
> Mar  3 22:10:39 myhost postgres[5158]: [3] LOG:  immediate shutdown
> request
>
> Mar  3 22:11:07 myhost postgres[1918]: [1] LOG:  database system was
> interrupted at 2005-03-03 21:08:53 MST
>
> Mar  3 22:11:07 myhost postgres[1918]: [2] LOG:  checkpoint record is
> at 1ABC/929DFCB4
>
> Mar  3 22:11:07 myhost postgres[1918]: [3] LOG:  redo record is at
> 1ABC/9044F3B4; undo record is at 0/0; shutdown FALSE
>
> Mar  3 22:11:07 myhost postgres[1918]: [4] LOG:  next transaction id:
> 1090597972; next oid: 4231750970
>
> Mar  3 22:11:07 myhost postgres[1918]: [5] LOG:  database system was
> not properly shut down; automatic recovery in progress
>
> Mar  3 22:11:07 myhost postgres[1918]: [6] LOG:  redo starts at
> 1ABC/9044F3B4
>
> Mar  3 22:11:07 myhost postgres[1919]: [1] FATAL:  The database system
> is starting up
>
> *** PG was up after a lot of the above message ***
>
>
>
> PG version is 7.3.2 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 3 (Taroon
> Update 4)
>
> I know it is old, but anyone can smell why PG shutdown itself?

This sounds like postgresql ran up against the Out Of Memory killer in
the linux kernel, but I thought it killed things with -9, which would
result in an immediate shutdown.  Maybe a ulimit issue?  Those are the
two most common causes of postgresql premature shutdown.

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: "Lee Wu"
Date:
Subject: Re: PG shutdown itself?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PG shutdown itself?