Thanks Tom!
Here is result:
mxl=# select * from pg_catalog.pg_class where relname =
'mxl_quar_process';
relname | relnamespace | reltype | relowner | relam | relfilenode |
relpages | reltuples | reltoastrelid | reltoastidxid | relhasindex |
relisshared | relkind | relnatts | relchecks | reltriggers | relukeys |
relfkeys | relrefs | relhasoids | relhaspkey | relhasrules |
relhassubclass | relacl
---------+--------------+---------+----------+-------+-------------+----
------+-----------+---------------+---------------+-------------+-------
------+---------+----------+-----------+-------------+----------+-------
---+---------+------------+------------+-------------+----------------+-
-------
(0 rows)
mxl=#
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 12:18 PM
To: Lee Wu
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] table not shown
"Lee Wu" <Lwu@mxlogic.com> writes:
> Here is screen shot:
> mxl=# select * from pg_class where relname = 'mxl_quar_process';
> [ no rows ]
> mxl=# select * from mxl_quar_process limit 1;
> [ data ]
That's just plain bizarre.
I'm wondering about corruption of the indexes on pg_class --- though I'd
have expected the system to use an indexscan to look up mxl_quar_process
for the second select, so it's not obvious why the first search would
fail and the second one not.
Your later report about "invalid adnum value 5 for table mxl_user_wbl"
also sounds like it could be due to index corruption.
I'd try doing a REINDEX DATABASE to see if that fixes it. (Read the
REINDEX man page fully before you start.)
One other thought --- it doesn't change anything if you do
select * from pg_catalog.pg_class where relname = 'mxl_quar_process';
does it?
regards, tom lane
