Re: trigger compile problem - Mailing list pgsql-general

From T.R.Missner@Level3.com
Subject Re: trigger compile problem
Date
Msg-id EBFCF3982143D511A77F0008C716807E0106DB31@N0400IDC1.oss.level3.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to trigger compile problem  (T.R.Missner@Level3.com)
List pgsql-general
I certainly wouldn't.
I am wondering if somehow pgaccess left this out and I cut and paste d waht
pgaccess built.  I'll check that in the morning.

The good news is my db absolutly screems now that I moved some processing
to
a trigger.  No more reason to look at mysql which I was dreading.

thanks for all the good work Tom,
t.r. missner


-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:23 PM
To: Missner, T. R.
Cc: Jan Wieck; doug@wireboard.com; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] trigger compile problem


T.R.Missner@Level3.com writes:
> It was the ; after END
> I feel like a tard.
> spent over 5 hours on this .

I've always wondered why plpgsql is so nitpickingly insistent on finding
a semicolon after the last END.  Would anyone object if I made the
last semi optional?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: trigger compile problem
Next
From: T.R.Missner@Level3.com
Date:
Subject: Re: trigger compile problem