Re: [GENERAL] Map of Postgresql Users (OT) - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Claire McLister
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Map of Postgresql Users (OT)
Date
Msg-id E807B5CA-67BA-4907-8C60-62335DBDC976@zeesource.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Map of Postgresql Users (OT)  ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>)
List pgsql-www
Well, we certainly do not want to do anything against the law. What
countries would these be?

On Dec 7, 2005, at 9:38 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
> It is an issue with the law in several countries. The two sets of
> information may be public, but the combined info is still sensitive.
> It's law, it doesn't have to make sense :-) I'm not sure if it applies
> exactly in this case, but it could very well do, and it's just
> unnecessary to risk stepping on it.
>
>
> It's a different thing if we have people who want to be listed by name
> register on a webpage. Then they volounteer the combined information,
> and it's perfectly ok to use it that way (especially since we'd say
> that's why).
>
> //Magnus
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
>        choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
>        match


pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: Integration Requirements
Next
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Map of Postgresql Users (OT)