Re: QUERY : RE: Four art Names - Mailing list pgsql-odbc

From Dave Page
Subject Re: QUERY : RE: Four art Names
Date
Msg-id E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4CC326C@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to QUERY : RE: Four art Names  ("Bazil Roshan" <bazil_f@persistent.co.in>)
List pgsql-odbc
 


From: pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Bazil Roshan
Sent: 07 October 2005 13:10
To: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org
Subject: [ODBC] QUERY : RE: Four art Names

Please Dave can you provide more inputs on why 4 part names cannot be supported on PGSQL.

 

 

Because a four pat name is formed from 

 

<DatabaseName>.<CatalogName>.<SchemaName>.<TableName>

 

and as PostgreSQL doesn't have any concept of catalogs, your can't give them a name (because apps that autogenerate queries might try to use it). According to the Microsoft docs though, you can use

 

<DatabaseName>..<SchemaName>.<TableName>

 

(note the double dot). If any of their products don't like that though you'll need to take it up with them.

 

Regards Dave

pgsql-odbc by date:

Previous
From: "Bazil Roshan"
Date:
Subject: QUERY : RE: Four art Names
Next
From: Marc Herbert
Date:
Subject: Re: CVS Moved