Re: New site - final(?) list of problems - Mailing list pgsql-www
From | Dave Page |
---|---|
Subject | Re: New site - final(?) list of problems |
Date | |
Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4527F29@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk Whole thread Raw |
In response to | New site - final(?) list of problems ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Responses |
Re: New site - final(?) list of problems
|
List | pgsql-www |
> -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Omar Kilani > Sent: 16 December 2004 09:59 > To: PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] New site - final(?) list of problems > > Hi, > > > Anyway, I haven't seen any commits in the last couple of days so I > > assume he's more or less finished (Omar; can you confirm > where you think > > we're at please?). The following are the issues with the > site that I've > > found, barring a couple that I've fixed already: > > I was very busy with a pure CSS implementation, which I've > just committed. :-) > > - PostgreSQL 8.0 is not out yet but is featured on the front page > > I thought the point of the new site was to go live with the > release of > 8.0. No reason to put it up before that, is there? Testing. We don't want to find a major problem the day we release and get slashdotted. > > - No privacy policy, yet links to one > > Well, I was waiting for it to magically write itself. :) <grin> - I'll review the techdoc one per Justin's suggestion - anyone object to using that assuming it's roughly suitable? > > - View this page in... links for unused languages > > Gone with new commit. Actually, the whole language thing needs to be > rethought. A language should only be added to the list if the vast > majority of the site has been translated. We should follow > what Mozilla > Europe does for their site. http://www.mozilla-europe.org . A much > better system, really. Yes - we use about 90% in pgAdmin before we list a language as official. Still, before we can use any languages we need a way to update the pot file... > The previous method doesn't make any sense. Say you wanted to link to > the news section from another page (like we do in about)--not > only the > front page. With the previous method, there would be no way > to see the > 'active' news on that secondary page. It makes no sense for > things to > disappear from the secondary page. The purpose of the front > page is to > show (at maximum) 3 latest news and event items [any news > item that is > accepted, and any event that is accepted and has a start date > > today, > limit 3.) > > The upcoming events stuff will work properly when the events > have dates > assigned. I've gone through all the events and added dates > and locations > to every single one, but I'll need to modify update.sql. If you're limiting stuff on the front page then I think you need 2 secondary pages - one for the active-only stuff, and one archive page listing everything (possible not the currently active stuff). Or is that what you are saying (my brain is mush right now - I'm in the middle of a software licence audit). > > Let's make the final push and get this out the door!! :-) > > Getting excited there, Dave? :) Just trying to chivvy up some enthusiasm from everyone. It would be nice to get this job done and move on... Regards, Dave