Re: Snapshot release 08.00.0002 uploaded - Mailing list pgsql-odbc

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Snapshot release 08.00.0002 uploaded
Date
Msg-id E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4306D40@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Snapshot release 08.00.0002 uploaded  ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
Responses 08.00.0002 useless :-)
List pgsql-odbc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Max Cohan
> Sent: 21 October 2004 07:49
> To: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] Snapshot release 08.00.0002 uploaded
>
>
> You might want to submit this to the main bug/wish list.
> This seems like something sane and probably fairly easy to
> support in the server itself. It seems like there is nothing
> implicitly wrong with the "table"."field" syntax and the
> server itself should understand it.

It does. What it doesn't understand is mixed case unquoted identifiers,
which other databases should also barf on - the difference being,
PostgreSQL folds them to lower case, other DBMSs fold them to upper
case.

Regards, Dave

pgsql-odbc by date:

Previous
From: Max Cohan
Date:
Subject: Re: Snapshot release 08.00.0002 uploaded
Next
From: "Lothar Behrens"
Date:
Subject: Still problems with pgODBC