> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us]
> Sent: 03 April 2006 14:41
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Tom Lane; zhaoxin; pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] problem about maximum row size ?
>
> Dave Page wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org
> > > [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of
> Bruce Momjian
> > > Sent: 03 April 2006 04:41
> > > To: Tom Lane
> > > Cc: zhaoxin; pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org
> > > Subject: Re: [ODBC] problem about maximum row size ?
> > >
> > > FAQ updated with new number, and mention that increasing
> block size
> > > quadruples it.
> >
> > I've updated the limitations page on the website, though I didn't
> > bother with the blocksize hack on there.
> >
> > Whilst we're on the subject, is 16TB for a table still
> correct given
> > CE partitioning?
>
> Uh, probably not, but do we want to require CE to increase that limit?
It's worth a mention don't you think? Something like:
Maximum table size: 16TB (for a partitioned table, this is the maximum
size of each partition).
Regards, Dave
