Re: Very newbie question - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Олег Самойлов
Subject Re: Very newbie question
Date
Msg-id E3DE0722-C26F-4BC4-A7EB-7387B56EFAAF@ya.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Very newbie question  (Francisco Olarte <folarte@peoplecall.com>)
Responses Re: Very newbie question
List pgsql-general
Well, get list of partitions and later scan one by one all 100 partitions is too simple. :) I am interesting is here
moreelegant way? Any rewriting the query, any creating an index are permitted. 

> 23 окт. 2023 г., в 18:25, Francisco Olarte <folarte@peoplecall.com> написал(а):
>
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 at 17:14, Олег Самойлов <splarv@ya.ru> wrote:
>> Back pardon, but I have a very newbie question. I have a partitioned table, partitioned by primary bigint key, size
ofpartition 10000000. I need to get the number of partition which need to archive, which has all rows are olden then 3
month.Here is query: 
>>
>> SELECT id/10000000 as partition
>>   FROM delivery
>>   GROUP BY partition
>>   HAVING max(created_at) < CURRENT_DATE - '3 month'::interval;
>>
>> The 'id/10000000 as partition' is a number of the partition, it later will be used inside the partition name.
>> The query runs long by sequence scan. Has anyone any ideas how to rewrite query so it will use any index?
>
> You should send an explain of your query, and your table and index definition.
>
> Unless you are tied to do this in one query, and assuming you have an
> index by "created_at", I normally do these kind of things by:
> 1.- Get list of partitions, sort oldest first.
> 2.- do "select created_at from $partition order by created at desc
> limit 1", which normally is just an index lookup, and compare
> client-side.
> You can do the date math in the database too. Also, rhs of the
> comparison seems to be date, if created_at is timestamp you may be
> blocking the optimizer for some things.
>
> Francisco Olarte.




pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Browder
Date:
Subject: Re: Presentation tools used ?
Next
From: Олег Самойлов
Date:
Subject: Re: Very newbie question