pgsql: checkpointer: Request checkpoint via latch instead of signal - Mailing list pgsql-committers

From Andres Freund
Subject pgsql: checkpointer: Request checkpoint via latch instead of signal
Date
Msg-id E1tbSNL-003L6n-Oy@gemulon.postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-committers
checkpointer: Request checkpoint via latch instead of signal

The motivation for this change is that a future commit will use SIGINT for
another purpose (postmaster requesting WAL access to be shut down) and that
there no other signals that we could readily use (see code comment for the
reason why SIGTERM shouldn't be used). But it's also a tad nicer / more
efficient to use SetLatch(), as it avoids sending signals when checkpointer
already is busy.

Reviewed-by: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/kgng5nrvnlv335evmsuvpnh354rw7qyazl73kdysev2cr2v5zu@m3cfzxicm5kp

Branch
------
master

Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/4d271e3ec25138be360b5a6ee40ec8bfa12459e0

Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/postmaster/checkpointer.c | 58 +++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)


pgsql-committers by date:

Previous
From: Álvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: pgsql: Simplify signature of RewriteTable
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: pgsql: Add SQL function CASEFOLD().