pgsql: Avoid potential spinlock in a signal handler as part of global b - Mailing list pgsql-committers

From Andres Freund
Subject pgsql: Avoid potential spinlock in a signal handler as part of global b
Date
Msg-id E1jle2C-0005Cz-3D@gemulon.postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-committers
Avoid potential spinlock in a signal handler as part of global barriers.

On platforms without support for 64bit atomic operations where we also
cannot rely on 64bit reads to have single copy atomicity, such atomics
are implemented using a spinlock based fallback. That means it's not
safe to even read such atomics from within a signal handler (since the
signal handler might run when the spinlock already is held).

To avoid this issue defer global barrier processing out of the signal
handler. Instead of checking local / shared barrier generation to
determine whether to set ProcSignalBarrierPending, introduce
PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER and always set ProcSignalBarrierPending when
receiving such a signal. Additionally avoid redundant work in
ProcessProcSignalBarrier if ProcSignalBarrierPending is unnecessarily.

Also do a small amount of other polishing.

Author: Andres Freund
Reviewed-By: Robert Haas
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200609193723.eu5ilsjxwdpyxhgz@alap3.anarazel.de
Backpatch: 13-, where the code was introduced.

Branch
------
REL_13_STABLE

Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/09bff91b316e90bf7f523593c1e8000c772cbe52

Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/storage/ipc/procsignal.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
src/include/storage/procsignal.h     |  1 +
2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)


pgsql-committers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: pgsql: Avoid potential spinlock in a signal handler as part of global b
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: pgsql: spinlock emulation: Fix bug when more than INT_MAX spinlocks are