pgsql: Avoid using a cursor in plpgsql's RETURN QUERY statement. - Mailing list pgsql-committers

From Tom Lane
Subject pgsql: Avoid using a cursor in plpgsql's RETURN QUERY statement.
Date
Msg-id E1jjmKK-0001Rk-JZ@gemulon.postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-committers
Avoid using a cursor in plpgsql's RETURN QUERY statement.

plpgsql has always executed the query given in a RETURN QUERY command
by opening it as a cursor and then fetching a few rows at a time,
which it turns around and dumps into the function's result tuplestore.
The point of this was to keep from blowing out memory with an oversized
SPITupleTable result (note that while a tuplestore can spill tuples
to disk, SPITupleTable cannot).  However, it's rather inefficient, both
because of extra data copying and because of executor entry/exit
overhead.  In recent versions, a new performance problem has emerged:
use of a cursor prevents use of a parallel plan for the executed query.

We can improve matters by skipping use of a cursor and having the
executor push result tuples directly into the function's result
tuplestore.  However, a moderate amount of new infrastructure is needed
to make that idea work:

* We can use the existing tstoreReceiver.c DestReceiver code to funnel
executor output to the tuplestore, but it has to be extended to support
plpgsql's requirement for possibly applying a tuple conversion map.

* SPI needs to be extended to allow use of a caller-supplied
DestReceiver instead of its usual receiver that puts tuples into
a SPITupleTable.  Two new API calls are needed to handle both the
RETURN QUERY and RETURN QUERY EXECUTE cases.

I also felt that I didn't want these new API calls to use the legacy
method of specifying query parameter values with "char" null flags
(the old ' '/'n' convention); rather they should accept ParamListInfo
objects containing the parameter type and value info.  This required
a bit of additional new infrastructure since we didn't yet have any
parse analysis callback that would interpret $N parameter symbols
according to type data supplied in a ParamListInfo.  There seems to be
no harm in letting makeParamList install that callback by default,
rather than leaving a new ParamListInfo's parserSetup hook as NULL.
(Indeed, as of HEAD, I couldn't find anyplace that was using the
parserSetup field at all; plpgsql was using parserSetupArg for its
own purposes, but parserSetup seemed to be write-only.)

We can actually get plpgsql out of the business of using legacy null
flags altogether, and using ParamListInfo instead of its ad-hoc
PreparedParamsData structure; but this requires inventing one more
SPI API call that can replace SPI_cursor_open_with_args.  That seems
worth doing, though.

SPI_execute_with_args and SPI_cursor_open_with_args are now unused
anywhere in the core PG distribution.  Perhaps someday we could
deprecate/remove them.  But cleaning up the crufty bits of the SPI
API is a task for a different patch.

Per bug #16040 from Jeremy Smith.  This is unfortunately too invasive to
consider back-patching.  Patch by me; thanks to Hamid Akhtar for review.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16040-eaacad11fecfb198@postgresql.org

Branch
------
master

Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/2f48ede080f42b97b594fb14102c82ca1001b80c

Modified Files
--------------
doc/src/sgml/spi.sgml                 | 349 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
src/backend/commands/portalcmds.c     |   4 +-
src/backend/executor/spi.c            | 159 +++++++++++++++-
src/backend/executor/tstoreReceiver.c |  67 ++++++-
src/backend/nodes/params.c            |  63 +++++-
src/backend/tcop/pquery.c             |   4 +-
src/include/executor/spi.h            |  13 ++
src/include/executor/tstoreReceiver.h |   4 +-
src/pl/plpgsql/src/pl_exec.c          | 280 ++++++++++++++-------------
9 files changed, 796 insertions(+), 147 deletions(-)


pgsql-committers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: pgsql: Fix typos and some format mistakes in comments
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: pgsql: Add missing extern keyword for a couple of numutils functions