Remove EState.es_range_table_array.
Now that list_nth is O(1), there's no good reason to maintain a
separate array of RTE pointers rather than indexing into
estate->es_range_table. Deleting the array doesn't save all that
much either; but just on cleanliness grounds, it's better not to
have duplicate representations of the identical information.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/14960.1565384592@sss.pgh.pa.us
Branch
------
master
Details
-------
https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/3c926587b5928795e54dfea65c712a604f63cdeb
Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/executor/execMain.c | 1 -
src/backend/executor/execUtils.c | 23 +++++------------------
src/include/executor/executor.h | 3 +--
src/include/nodes/execnodes.h | 1 -
4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
