pgsql: Further hacking on ruleutils' new column-alias-assignment code. - Mailing list pgsql-committers

From Tom Lane
Subject pgsql: Further hacking on ruleutils' new column-alias-assignment code.
Date
Msg-id E1V1kZB-0006Od-Su@gemulon.postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-committers
Further hacking on ruleutils' new column-alias-assignment code.

After further thought about implicit coercions appearing in a joinaliasvars
list, I realized that they represent an additional reason why we might need
to reference the join output column directly instead of referencing an
underlying column.  Consider SELECT x FROM t1 LEFT JOIN t2 USING (x) where
t1.x is of type date while t2.x is of type timestamptz.  The merged output
variable is of type timestamptz, but it won't go to null when t2 does,
therefore neither t1.x nor t2.x is a valid substitute reference.

The code in get_variable() actually gets this case right, since it knows
it shouldn't look through a coercion, but we failed to ensure that the
unqualified output column name would be globally unique.  To fix, modify
the code that trawls for a dangerous situation so that it actually scans
through an unnamed join's joinaliasvars list to see if there are any
non-simple-Var entries.

Branch
------
REL9_3_STABLE

Details
-------
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/7f5cfe914de49130d86b2e1e9636b7135e577ef1

Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/utils/adt/ruleutils.c         |   92 +++++++++++++++++------------
src/test/regress/expected/create_view.out |   28 +++++++++
src/test/regress/sql/create_view.sql      |   13 ++++
3 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)


pgsql-committers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: pgsql: Check for NULL result from strdup
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: pgsql: Further hacking on ruleutils' new column-alias-assignment code.