Re: Query is over 2x slower with jit=on - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Query is over 2x slower with jit=on
Date
Msg-id E174F2D9-4D1E-4C12-A79C-33182CB490CA@anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Query is over 2x slower with jit=on  (Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>)
List pgsql-hackers

On April 18, 2018 9:50:48 AM PDT, Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net> wrote:
>On 04/18/2018 12:27 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>
>> Please change the name of the "JIT" parameter to something meaningful
>> to humans before this gets too far into the wild.
>>
>> SSL is somewhat understandable because its not a Postgres-private
>term.
>
>JIT is hardly a Postgres-private term. It's a familiar term in a
>widespread community, though I might cede the point that the
>community in question is more compiler wonks than DBAs.

You're right. There's another thread where we discussed this. Also due to concern of Simon's. Can we not do so
separatelyhere? 

Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Speedup of relation deletes during recovery
Next
From: Teodor Sigaev
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.