Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From 曾文旌
Subject Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Date
Msg-id E009FDD3-D2F9-45E6-B378-62BC6A44CBE6@alibaba-inc.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
I have written the README for the GTT, which contains the GTT requirements and design.
I found that compared to my first email a year ago, many GTT Limitations are now gone.
Now, I'm adding comments to some of the necessary functions.


Wenjing





> 2020年7月31日 上午4:57,Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> 写道:
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 8:09 AM wenjing zeng <wjzeng2012@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Please continue to review the code.
>
> This patch is pretty light on comments. Many of the new functions have
> no header comments, for example. There are comments here and there in
> the body of the new functions that are added, and in places where
> existing code is changed there are comments here and there, but
> overall it's not a whole lot. There's no documentation and no README,
> either. Since this adds a new feature and a bunch of new SQL-callable
> functions that interact with that feature, the feature itself should
> be documented, along with its limitations and the new SQL-callable
> functions that interact with it. I think there should be either a
> lengthy comment in some suitable file, or maybe various comments in
> various files, or else a README file, that clearly sets out the major
> design principles behind the patch, and explaining also what that
> means in terms of features and limitations. Without that, it's really
> hard for anyone to jump into reviewing this code, and it will be hard
> for people who have to maintain it in the future to understand it,
> either. Or for users, for that matter.
>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Matthias van de Meent
Date:
Subject: [patch] _bt_binsrch* improvements - equal-prefix-skip binary search
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators?