Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [PATCH] Reserve protocol 3.1 explicitly in pqcomm.h - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jelte Fennema-Nio
Subject Re: [PATCH] Reserve protocol 3.1 explicitly in pqcomm.h
Date
Msg-id DFU3PPIVV2DG.3UW9LAK329PJS@jeltef.nl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Reserve protocol 3.1 explicitly in pqcomm.h  (Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Reserve protocol 3.1 explicitly in pqcomm.h
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Wed Jan 21, 2026 at 12:17 AM CET, Jacob Champion wrote:
> I'd be fine with either; slight preference for "RESERVED" I suppose?

RESERVED seems clearer to me. And for people interested in why, the
comment above its definition describes it suffiecently.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ilia Evdokimov
Date:
Subject: Re: Optional skipping of unchanged relations during ANALYZE?
Next
From: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: Newly created replication slot may be invalidated by checkpoint