Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [PATCH] Reserve protocol 3.1 explicitly in pqcomm.h - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jacob Champion
Subject Re: [PATCH] Reserve protocol 3.1 explicitly in pqcomm.h
Date
Msg-id CAOYmi+=oOqkvuij1boH4RzDnkTJoUhR8_WtT3DYoqqgwjm8gJg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Reserve protocol 3.1 explicitly in pqcomm.h  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Reserve protocol 3.1 explicitly in pqcomm.h
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 3:10 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> How about "PG_PROTOCOL_RESERVED_31" or
> "PG_PROTOCOL_UNUSED_31"?

I'd be fine with either; slight preference for "RESERVED" I suppose?

Thanks!
--Jacob

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reserve protocol 3.1 explicitly in pqcomm.h
Next
From: Zsolt Parragi
Date:
Subject: Re: Flush some statistics within running transactions