Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [PATCH] Reserve protocol 3.1 explicitly in pqcomm.h - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jacob Champion
Subject Re: [PATCH] Reserve protocol 3.1 explicitly in pqcomm.h
Date
Msg-id CAOYmi+mbza4JbqZ2_tAbpWKQuLiUn-FQhJC8e-eFvayA_bNV9A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Reserve protocol 3.1 explicitly in pqcomm.h  ("Jelte Fennema-Nio" <postgres@jeltef.nl>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 11:50 PM Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl> wrote:
> RESERVED seems clearer to me. And for people interested in why, the
> comment above its definition describes it suffiecently.

Pushed as PG_PROTOCOL_RESERVED_31. Thank you both!

--Jacob

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dharin Shah
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests: verify renamed index functionality in alter_table
Next
From: Jelte Fennema-Nio
Date:
Subject: Re: New year, new commitfest app improvements