Hi,
On 2011/12/04, at 9:45, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> Yes, but there's a deal more work to do here. This whole thing is falling over in my build environment (64 bit
Windows7, MinGW/MSys, the machine that runs pitta on the buildfarm.)
>>
>> This is a long way from a done deal.
>
> In particular, it's a major mess because it does this (or at least the version I'm using does):
>
> #define stat _stat64
>
> which plays merry hell with pgwin32_safestat(). Working around that looks very unpleasant indeed.
Thank you for testing and reporting.
Would you mind giving me a bit more information on the environment?
--especially for the MinGW/MSYS versions and any other component that is required.
I tested on a virtual machine running 64 bit Windows 7 SP1,
installing MinGW/MSYS in the clean state and then compile.
The versions coming with pre-packaged repository catalogues of 20110802
(gcc 4.5.2) and latest catalogue (gcc-4.6.1-2) compiles successfully.
On 2011/12/04, at 9:45, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> On 12/03/2011 06:12 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/03/2011 09:59 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 15:49, NISHIYAMA Tomoaki
>>> <tomoakin@staff.kanazawa-u.ac.jp> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>> Have you verified if tihs affects _MSC_VER< 1400? Suddently that
>>>>> branch would care about HAVE_CRTDEFS_H, and I'm not sure if that's
>>>>> something we need to worry about.
>>>>
>>>> I have no MSVC. In that sense it is not verified in fact, and I hope
>>>> those who knows well would kindly comment on it.
>>>>
>>>> However, it appears that pg_config.h is not created through
>>>> configure, but just copied from pg_config.h.win32 in those
>>>> compilers and thus HAVE_CRTDEFS_H will not be defined.
>>>> So, I think this code fragment will not be enabled in
>>>> _MSC_VER< 1400
>>> Hmm, true. Unless HAVE_CRTDEFS_H is defined by the sytem, which it
>>> likely isn't - I was confusing it with the kind of defines that MSVC
>>> tends to stick in their own headerfiles, and thought that's what you
>>> were testing for.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Yes, but there's a deal more work to do here. This whole thing is falling over in my build environment (64 bit
Windows7, MinGW/MSys, the machine that runs pitta on the buildfarm.)
>>
>> This is a long way from a done deal.
>
>
> In particular, it's a major mess because it does this (or at least the version I'm using does):
>
> #define stat _stat64
>
>
> which plays merry hell with pgwin32_safestat(). Working around that looks very unpleasant indeed.
>
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
