> On 5 Jan 2019, at 01:04, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 02:45:55PM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> (Michael: sorry for not having responded to your comments on the patch, $life
>> has had little time over for hacking lately)
>
> No worries, I understand.
>
>> There is that. We might not be excited about writing tests for this
>> contrib module but someone else might want to use this for testing
>> their application in a similar manner to how pg_regress tests?
>
> If we don't introduce it, there is no way to know. Still if somebody
> needs to create regression tests they could just use EXPLAIN for the
> same purpose. However, the option still seems useful to me to get out
> plans with the most generic output, so I support the idea. If others
> don't feel so, I am fine to give up as well.
This didn’t attract any other interested parties, and I don’t feel the added
complexity is worth a continued discussion, so I’m closing this patch. Thanks
for the review.
cheers ./daniel
