Question about the Implementation of vector32_is_highbit_set on ARM - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Xiang Gao
Subject Question about the Implementation of vector32_is_highbit_set on ARM
Date
Msg-id DB9PR08MB699134FB0CA9E25C45E2DB7BF5A8A@DB9PR08MB6991.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Question about the Implementation of vector32_is_highbit_set on ARM  (John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi all,
I have some questions about the implementation of vector32_is_highbit_set  on arm.
Below is the comment and the implementation for this function.
/*
 * Exactly like vector8_is_highbit_set except for the input type, so it
 * looks at each byte separately.
 *
 * XXX x86 uses the same underlying type for 8-bit, 16-bit, and 32-bit
 * integer elements, but Arm does not, hence the need for a separate
 * function. We could instead adopt the behavior of Arm's vmaxvq_u32(), i.e.
 * check each 32-bit element, but that would require an additional mask
 * operation on x86.
 */
#ifndef USE_NO_SIMD
static inline bool
vector32_is_highbit_set(const Vector32 v)
{
#if defined(USE_NEON)
        return vector8_is_highbit_set((Vector8) v);
#else
        return vector8_is_highbit_set(v);
#endif
}
#endif                                                  /* ! USE_NO_SIMD */

But I still don't understand why the vmaxvq_u32 intrinsic  is not used on the arm platform.
We have used the macro USE_NEON to distinguish different platforms.
In addition, according to the "Arm Neoverse N1 Software Optimization Guide",
The vmaxvq_u32 intrinsic  has half the latency of vmaxvq_u8 and twice the bandwidth.
So I think just use vmaxvq_u32 directly.

Any comments or feedback are welcome.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you
arenot the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other
person,use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: Improve WALRead() to suck data directly from WAL buffers when possible
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Clean up role created in new subscription test.